FBI Will No Longer Investigate Assault Claims Against ICE Agents, Reports Say
FBI reportedly stops investigating assault claims against ICE agents, sparking concerns over accountability in immigration enforcement.
dianeherr/Flickr
The FBI has reportedly stopped investigating assault allegations against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, according to a recent report by The New York Times. This significant shift in federal law enforcement oversight, revealed in July 2026, has raised concerns about potential reductions in accountability for immigration officers amid ongoing controversies involving use of force.
Details of the FBI’s Change in Investigation Policy
Sources cited by The New York Times indicate that FBI managers received written notification on July 16, 2026, informing them that the bureau will no longer lead investigations into assault claims made against ICE agents. Some ICE personnel across the country have been briefed on this change directly by their FBI counterparts. Previously, the FBI was often tasked with investigating whether ICE agents were assaulted before opening fire in fatal encounters, a process that also fed into civil rights probes.
Under this new approach, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), a division within ICE, would be responsible for investigating allegations against its own agents. Critics argue this shift could undermine impartiality and reduce transparency in cases involving use of force or alleged misconduct by immigration officers.
Concerns About Accountability and Civil Rights Enforcement
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Department of Justice (DOJ) have both denied that any official change in investigative authority has taken place. In a joint statement released July 19, 2026, they emphasized ongoing cooperation between agencies and said the FBI will continue investigations “in accordance with agency policy.”
However, legal experts and advocacy groups caution that allowing DHS entities to investigate their own agents could weaken enforcement of civil rights laws. Unlike the FBI, DHS lacks clear jurisdiction to probe federal civil rights violations, raising fears that serious allegations against ICE agents might not be rigorously examined.
Such concerns come amid a troubling recent pattern: ICE agents have fatally shot seven individuals since January 2025, with two shootings occurring in July 2026 alone. The most recent cases include the killing of Colombian immigrant Joan Sebastian Guerrero in Biddeford, Maine, on July 14, and Mexican immigrant Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in Houston on July 7.
Implications for Immigration Enforcement and Community Trust
The reported policy shift arrives at a sensitive time for immigration enforcement agencies. ICE has faced heightened scrutiny over use-of-force incidents, particularly those involving fatal shootings of immigrants. Community leaders and civil rights advocates worry that reduced external oversight will erode public trust and hinder efforts to hold agents accountable.
Some immigration agents have expressed frustration over the change, fearing it could complicate investigations and open agents to unchecked accusations. Meanwhile, critics argue that independent, transparent investigations are essential to protect both the public and responsible officers.
Next Steps and Ongoing Developments
As of July 20, 2026, no formal policy announcement has been made by DHS or DOJ confirming or denying a permanent shift in investigative responsibilities. The Departments have reiterated their commitment to uphold the rule of law and ensure safety in all federal law enforcement actions.
Observers expect that congressional oversight hearings or further media scrutiny could follow, especially if additional incidents involving ICE agents arise. For communities in Wayne and Duplin counties and across North Carolina, the issue underscores ongoing tensions between immigration enforcement and civil rights protections.
As this story develops, the Mount Olive Chronicle will continue to provide updates on agency policies, local impacts, and community responses to these federal enforcement shifts.


